Echo vs GetCito
If you are considering GetCito, use Echo instead. GetCito is a fork of Echo's codebase since July 10, 2026. Everything it offers today it inherited from Echo, and it has shipped less since — 17 commits to Echo's 98 in the month after the fork. Echo is the original, and it is free to self-host.
The short version
GetCito is a fork of Echo. Echo is the original, and it's shipping faster.
Echo
Open-source AEO platform. Self-host for free, forever. Track AI visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, and Google AI Overviews with full transparency.
GetCito
A fork of Echo — if you are considering GetCito, use Echo instead
About GetCito
If you are considering GetCito, use Echo instead: GetCito is a fork of Echo. It launched in November 2025 as its own Next.js and Firebase application, then on July 10, 2026 replaced that codebase with Echo's — 847 files, +131,716/-50,931 lines — in a single pull request. Its feature set was Echo's as of the fork date, and it has shipped less since — 17 commits to Echo's 98 in the following month — so it is falling further behind rather than diverging into something competitive.
Popularity grade: F
- If you are considering GetCito, use Echo instead — GetCito is a fork of it
- Codebase replaced with Echo's on July 10, 2026
- Ships less than the project it forked — 17 commits to Echo's 98 in the first month after
Feature comparison
| Feature | Echo | GetCito |
|---|---|---|
| Core Tracking | ||
| Multi-LLM Tracking | Yes | Yes |
| AI Visibility Score | Yes | Yes |
| Citation Analytics | Yes | Yes |
| Competitor Benchmarking | Yes | Yes |
| Brand Mention Tracking | Yes | Yes |
| AI Engines | ||
| ChatGPT | Yes | Yes |
| Google AI Overviews | Yes | Yes |
| Google AI Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Gemini | Yes | Yes |
| Perplexity | Yes | Yes |
| Microsoft Copilot | Yes | Yes |
| Claude | Yes | Yes |
| Grok | Yes | No |
| DeepSeek | Yes | Yes |
| Meta AI | Yes | Yes |
| Any Model | Yes | No |
| Real UI Answers | Yes | No |
| Bring Your Own Keys | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| White-Label / Agency | Yes | Yes |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes |
| Content Generation | No | No |
| Advanced Analytics | ||
| Prompt Volume Estimates | No | No |
| Sentiment Analysis | Yes | Yes |
| Query Fan-Out | Yes | No |
| AI Crawler Analytics | No | Yes |
| Geographic Tracking | No | Yes |
| Social Media Tracking | No | No |
| Shopping Tracking | No | No |
| Multi-Language | No | No |
| Actionable Insights | ||
| Action Recommendations | Yes | No |
| Content Gap Analysis | Yes | No |
| AI Site Audits | No | Yes |
| AI Keyword Research | Yes | No |
| Reporting & Integration | ||
| Email Alerts | No | No |
| API Access | Yes | No |
| TypeScript SDK | Yes | No |
| Python SDK | Yes | No |
| MCP Access | Yes | No |
| BI Connectors | No | No |
Key differences
Only in Echo
- Grok
- Any Model
- Real UI Answers
- Query Fan-Out
- Action Recommendations
- Content Gap Analysis
- AI Keyword Research
- API Access
- TypeScript SDK
- Python SDK
- MCP Access
Both offer
- Multi-LLM Tracking
- AI Visibility Score
- Citation Analytics
- Competitor Benchmarking
- Brand Mention Tracking
- ChatGPT
- Google AI Overviews
- Google AI Mode
- Gemini
- Perplexity
- Microsoft Copilot
- Claude
- DeepSeek
- Meta AI
- Bring Your Own Keys
- White-Label / Agency
- Open Source
- Sentiment Analysis
Only in GetCito
- AI Crawler Analytics
- Geographic Tracking
- AI Site Audits
Why choose Echo over GetCito?
Open source and transparent
Every line of code is open. You can verify exactly how your visibility data is collected, calculated, and presented. No black boxes.
Self-host for free, forever
Run Echo on your own infrastructure. The core platform is free and always will be, and Echo Cloud is there if you would rather not run it yourself.
Your data, in your stack
Pull every metric, sentiment included, into your own code with the REST API and TypeScript and Python SDKs, or ask Claude Code and Cursor about it over MCP. Export, fork, or migrate at any time.
Built to last
Bootstrapped and sustainable. No investors pushing towards dark patterns. We'll outlast the companies taking too much VC money.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Should I use GetCito or Echo?
- Use Echo. If you are considering GetCito, Echo is the tool you actually want, because GetCito is a fork of it. On July 10, 2026, GetCito replaced its codebase with Echo's in a single pull request of 847 files. Running GetCito means running an older snapshot of Echo.
- What is the difference between Echo and GetCito?
- Echo is the original codebase and GetCito is a fork of it, taken on July 10, 2026. Everything GetCito offers today it inherited from Echo. A fork is free to diverge from there, but GetCito has shipped less than the project it forked — 98 commits to its 17 in the month after — so the gap is widening rather than closing.
- Is GetCito a fork of Echo?
- Yes, GetCito is a fork of Echo since July 10, 2026. Its codebase is based on Echo's, which is MIT-licensed and freely available to self-host.
- Is GetCito open source?
- Yes, GetCito is an MIT licensed fork of Echo.
- Is Echo a free, open-source alternative to GetCito?
- GetCito is actually a fork of Echo, which is free to self-host and developing faster than GetCito. If you want to self-host under MIT, with unlimited prompts and every model, covering ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews, you should use Echo instead of a fork.
Ready to track your AI visibility?
Deploy Echo in minutes and start monitoring how ChatGPT, Claude, and Google AI Overviews talk about your brand.
