Echo vs Qwairy
Echo is an open-source, self-hostable alternative to Qwairy, an AI visibility tracking tool. Both measure how AI answer engines describe your brand, but Echo ships every line of code, runs on your own infrastructure, and is free to self-host — so your data stays yours and each metric is independently verifiable.
The short version
Qwairy starts at €79/mo and is closed source. Echo covers the same engines, and it's free to self-host.
Echo
Open-source AEO platform. Self-host for free, forever. Track AI visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, and Google AI Overviews with full transparency.
Qwairy
French GEO platform that distinguishes API from UI results per engine
About Qwairy
Qwairy tracks ten engines and labels each by how it is queried — ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Grok via both API and UI, AI Overview and AI Mode via UI, Claude, Mistral, and DeepSeek via API — which matters because API answers and what users actually see diverge. The platform runs cockpit, monitor, analyze, act, optimize, measure, and explore stages, with API reference, MCP documentation, playbooks, and an agency track. It is French, GDPR aligned, and hosts data in the EU.
Popularity grade: C
- Labels every engine as API or UI sourced, since the two disagree
- EU data hosting and GDPR alignment, built in France
- Documented API and MCP server alongside the dashboard
Feature comparison
| Feature | Echo | Qwairy |
|---|---|---|
| Core Tracking | ||
| Multi-LLM Tracking | Yes | Yes |
| AI Visibility Score | Yes | Yes |
| Citation Analytics | Yes | Yes |
| Competitor Benchmarking | Yes | Yes |
| Brand Mention Tracking | Yes | Yes |
| AI Engines | ||
| ChatGPT | Yes | Yes |
| Google AI Overviews | Yes | Yes |
| Google AI Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Gemini | Yes | Yes |
| Perplexity | Yes | Yes |
| Microsoft Copilot | Yes | Yes |
| Claude | Yes | Yes |
| Grok | Yes | Yes |
| DeepSeek | Yes | No |
| Meta AI | Yes | Yes |
| Any Model | Yes | No |
| Real UI Answers | Yes | Yes |
| Bring Your Own Keys | Yes | No |
| Platform | ||
| White-Label / Agency | Yes | Yes |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
| Content Generation | No | Yes |
| Advanced Analytics | ||
| Prompt Volume Estimates | No | No |
| Sentiment Analysis | Yes | Yes |
| Query Fan-Out | Yes | Yes |
| AI Crawler Analytics | No | Yes |
| Geographic Tracking | No | Yes |
| Social Media Tracking | No | No |
| Shopping Tracking | No | Yes |
| Multi-Language | No | Yes |
| Actionable Insights | ||
| Action Recommendations | Yes | Yes |
| Content Gap Analysis | Yes | Yes |
| AI Site Audits | No | Yes |
| AI Keyword Research | Yes | Yes |
| Reporting & Integration | ||
| Email Alerts | No | No |
| API Access | Yes | Yes |
| TypeScript SDK | Yes | No |
| Python SDK | Yes | No |
| MCP Access | Yes | Yes |
| BI Connectors | No | Yes |
Key differences
Only in Echo
- DeepSeek
- Any Model
- Bring Your Own Keys
- Open Source
- TypeScript SDK
- Python SDK
Both offer
- Multi-LLM Tracking
- AI Visibility Score
- Citation Analytics
- Competitor Benchmarking
- Brand Mention Tracking
- ChatGPT
- Google AI Overviews
- Google AI Mode
- Gemini
- Perplexity
- Microsoft Copilot
- Claude
- Grok
- Meta AI
- Real UI Answers
- White-Label / Agency
- Sentiment Analysis
- Query Fan-Out
- Action Recommendations
- Content Gap Analysis
- AI Keyword Research
- API Access
- MCP Access
Only in Qwairy
- Content Generation
- AI Crawler Analytics
- Geographic Tracking
- Shopping Tracking
- Multi-Language
- AI Site Audits
- BI Connectors
Why choose Echo over Qwairy?
Open source and transparent
Every line of code is open. You can verify exactly how your visibility data is collected, calculated, and presented. No black boxes.
Self-host for free, forever
Run Echo on your own infrastructure. The core platform is free and always will be, and Echo Cloud is there if you would rather not run it yourself.
Your data, in your stack
Pull every metric, sentiment included, into your own code with the REST API and TypeScript and Python SDKs, or ask Claude Code and Cursor about it over MCP. Export, fork, or migrate at any time.
Built to last
Bootstrapped and sustainable. No investors pushing towards dark patterns. We'll outlast the companies taking too much VC money.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is the difference between Echo and Qwairy?
- Echo is an open-source, self-hostable AI visibility platform, while Qwairy is a closed-source AI visibility tracking tool. Both track how AI answer engines describe your brand, but Echo gives you the full source code and runs on your own infrastructure, so you can verify every metric and keep your data in-house.
- Is Echo a free, open-source alternative to Qwairy?
- Yes. Echo is a free, open-source alternative to Qwairy. You can self-host the full platform at no cost, read every line of code, and track your AI visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews without per-seat or per-prompt fees.
- Is Qwairy open source?
- No, Qwairy is a closed-source, hosted product, so you cannot inspect how its metrics are calculated. Echo is fully open source — you can audit the code, self-host it on your own infrastructure, and avoid vendor lock-in.
- How do Echo and Qwairy compare on sentiment analysis, API access, and MCP?
- Echo includes all three: a 0 to 100 sentiment score for every AI answer that mentions you, a REST API with TypeScript and Python SDKs, and an MCP server so assistants like Claude Code and Cursor can query your data. Qwairy offers all three as well.
- Can I self-host Echo instead of Qwairy?
- Yes. Echo is designed to be self-hosted — deploy it on your own infrastructure in minutes with the CLI. You keep full ownership of your data and prompts, with no per-seat pricing and no third-party dashboard holding your visibility history.
Ready to track your AI visibility?
Deploy Echo in minutes and start monitoring how ChatGPT, Claude, and Google AI Overviews talk about your brand.