Echo vs Riff Analytics
Echo is an open-source, self-hostable alternative to Riff Analytics, an AI visibility tracking tool. Both measure how AI answer engines describe your brand, but Echo ships every line of code, runs on your own infrastructure, and is free to self-host — so your data stays yours and each metric is independently verifiable.
The short version
Riff Analytics doesn't list Microsoft Copilot among its engines and has no API or MCP server. Echo has all of that, and it's free to self-host.
Echo
Open-source AEO platform. Self-host for free, forever. Track AI visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, and Google AI Overviews with full transparency.
Riff Analytics
Seven-engine tracking framed around answer share and citation gaps
About Riff Analytics
Riff Analytics tracks brand visibility across ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Perplexity, Claude, Grok, DeepSeek, and Llama, reporting answer share and identifying top-cited sources so citation gaps can be closed. It scans a site for AI readiness — what engines see when they crawl the content — and returns a free report in about five minutes, with a seven-day trial.
Popularity grade: C
- Tracks Llama and DeepSeek alongside the mainstream five
- Free report in about five minutes before any signup
- AI readiness scan reports what crawlers actually see
Feature comparison
| Feature | Echo | Riff Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Core Tracking | ||
| Multi-LLM Tracking | Yes | Yes |
| AI Visibility Score | Yes | Yes |
| Citation Analytics | Yes | Yes |
| Competitor Benchmarking | Yes | Yes |
| Brand Mention Tracking | Yes | Yes |
| AI Engines | ||
| ChatGPT | Yes | Yes |
| Google AI Overviews | Yes | Yes |
| Google AI Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Gemini | Yes | Yes |
| Perplexity | Yes | Yes |
| Microsoft Copilot | Yes | No |
| Claude | Yes | Yes |
| Grok | Yes | Yes |
| DeepSeek | Yes | Yes |
| Meta AI | Yes | No |
| Any Model | Yes | No |
| Real UI Answers | Yes | No |
| Bring Your Own Keys | Yes | No |
| Platform | ||
| White-Label / Agency | Yes | No |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
| Content Generation | No | No |
| Advanced Analytics | ||
| Prompt Volume Estimates | No | No |
| Sentiment Analysis | Yes | Yes |
| Query Fan-Out | Yes | No |
| AI Crawler Analytics | No | No |
| Geographic Tracking | No | No |
| Social Media Tracking | No | No |
| Shopping Tracking | No | No |
| Multi-Language | No | No |
| Actionable Insights | ||
| Action Recommendations | Yes | Yes |
| Content Gap Analysis | Yes | Yes |
| AI Site Audits | No | Yes |
| AI Keyword Research | Yes | No |
| Reporting & Integration | ||
| Email Alerts | No | No |
| API Access | Yes | No |
| TypeScript SDK | Yes | No |
| Python SDK | Yes | No |
| MCP Access | Yes | No |
| BI Connectors | No | No |
Key differences
Only in Echo
- Microsoft Copilot
- Meta AI
- Any Model
- Real UI Answers
- Bring Your Own Keys
- White-Label / Agency
- Open Source
- Query Fan-Out
- AI Keyword Research
- API Access
- TypeScript SDK
- Python SDK
- MCP Access
Both offer
- Multi-LLM Tracking
- AI Visibility Score
- Citation Analytics
- Competitor Benchmarking
- Brand Mention Tracking
- ChatGPT
- Google AI Overviews
- Google AI Mode
- Gemini
- Perplexity
- Claude
- Grok
- DeepSeek
- Sentiment Analysis
- Action Recommendations
- Content Gap Analysis
Only in Riff Analytics
- AI Site Audits
Why choose Echo over Riff Analytics?
Open source and transparent
Every line of code is open. You can verify exactly how your visibility data is collected, calculated, and presented. No black boxes.
Self-host for free, forever
Run Echo on your own infrastructure. The core platform is free and always will be, and Echo Cloud is there if you would rather not run it yourself.
Your data, in your stack
Pull every metric, sentiment included, into your own code with the REST API and TypeScript and Python SDKs, or ask Claude Code and Cursor about it over MCP. Export, fork, or migrate at any time.
Built to last
Bootstrapped and sustainable. No investors pushing towards dark patterns. We'll outlast the companies taking too much VC money.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is the difference between Echo and Riff Analytics?
- Echo is an open-source, self-hostable AI visibility platform, while Riff Analytics is a closed-source AI visibility tracking tool. Both track how AI answer engines describe your brand, but Echo gives you the full source code and runs on your own infrastructure, so you can verify every metric and keep your data in-house.
- Is Echo a free, open-source alternative to Riff Analytics?
- Yes. Echo is a free, open-source alternative to Riff Analytics. You can self-host the full platform at no cost, read every line of code, and track your AI visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews without per-seat or per-prompt fees.
- Is Riff Analytics open source?
- No, Riff Analytics is a closed-source, hosted product, so you cannot inspect how its metrics are calculated. Echo is fully open source — you can audit the code, self-host it on your own infrastructure, and avoid vendor lock-in.
- How do Echo and Riff Analytics compare on sentiment analysis, API access, and MCP?
- Echo includes all three: a 0 to 100 sentiment score for every AI answer that mentions you, a REST API with TypeScript and Python SDKs, and an MCP server so assistants like Claude Code and Cursor can query your data. Riff Analytics offers sentiment analysis, but we have not found it offering API access or an MCP server.
- Can I self-host Echo instead of Riff Analytics?
- Yes. Echo is designed to be self-hosted — deploy it on your own infrastructure in minutes with the CLI. You keep full ownership of your data and prompts, with no per-seat pricing and no third-party dashboard holding your visibility history.
Ready to track your AI visibility?
Deploy Echo in minutes and start monitoring how ChatGPT, Claude, and Google AI Overviews talk about your brand.